tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7380804.post111127315798683330..comments2023-09-19T19:45:50.854+12:00Comments on Spanblather: naming daddy IISpanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16896745511007816190noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7380804.post-57305369587712620082021-04-09T20:01:50.298+12:002021-04-09T20:01:50.298+12:00Nice blog. For more information visit Arizona Dna ...Nice blog. For more information visit <a href="https://www.azdna.com/contact-azdna-com/" rel="nofollow">Arizona Dna Testing</a>Thomas Childresshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14269153970404881463noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7380804.post-1111391793478650602005-03-21T19:56:00.000+12:002005-03-21T19:56:00.000+12:00good point Anon, but not one that i suspect Muriel...good point Anon, but not one that i suspect Muriel et al will give much credence too. explanations that don't involve blaming the mother don't seem to get a look-in :-(Spanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16896745511007816190noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7380804.post-1111387890438636682005-03-21T18:51:00.000+12:002005-03-21T18:51:00.000+12:00Isn't there another explanation for women not nami...Isn't there another explanation for women not naming the father of their children - a well-founded fear that they'll get the shhit beaten out of them if they dare expose men to liability for child support?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7380804.post-1111284072977173572005-03-20T14:01:00.000+12:002005-03-20T14:01:00.000+12:00Yes I did, and as I said the current policy is not...Yes I did, and as I said the current policy is not perfect. If the named father is in NZ then the issue can be resolved by paternity tests. If they have fled overseas, then for that very small fraction of cases, hopefully the IRD shows some discretion.David Farrarhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16671886921725110921noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7380804.post-1111281328452114172005-03-20T13:15:00.000+12:002005-03-20T13:15:00.000+12:00did you actually read my first post DPF? you have...did you actually read my first post DPF? you have completely ignored one possible (and seeming increasingly likely) reason which is the case i outlined in my first post - women who name the father but IRD doesn't accept their naming as the father has not consented. i don't see how you can really blame the mother in that situation.Spanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16896745511007816190noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7380804.post-1111279592389833712005-03-20T12:46:00.000+12:002005-03-20T12:46:00.000+12:00The current policy is not perfect but what is the ...The current policy is not perfect but what is the alternative for the growing number of kids being born officially fatherless?<BR/><BR/>There are two explanations for the huge increases we have seen.<BR/><BR/>1) A huge number of women have become so promiscous that they have no idea who the father is<BR/><BR/>2) The women do know who the father is, and have agreed not to name him, in exchange for cash payments from the father, so he avoids paying child support through the IRD.David Farrarhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16671886921725110921noreply@blogger.com