tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7380804.post111879839688569499..comments2023-09-19T19:45:50.854+12:00Comments on Spanblather: selwyn pleads guilty?Spanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16896745511007816190noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7380804.post-1118871129390150632005-06-16T09:32:00.000+12:002005-06-16T09:32:00.000+12:00hey Mr T, thanks for the info.sorry i got it wrong...hey Mr T, thanks for the info.<BR/><BR/>sorry i got it wrong in the post about what you admitted - i realised when i saw it on the news but this has been my first chance to come back and correct it.Spanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16896745511007816190noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7380804.post-1118837990864242442005-06-16T00:19:00.000+12:002005-06-16T00:19:00.000+12:00One tries.I have pled guilty to being a party to a...One tries.<BR/><BR/>I have pled guilty to being a party to a conspiracy to commit intentional damage and await sentencing next month at the earliest. But I am going to trial on two sedition charges. I have to defend those. We can't hand the government a thought crime as a newly revived tool of repression can we? It simply won't do.<BR/><BR/>I've admitted that conspiracy intentional damage charge to save everyone a lot of time, effort and resources. Proving someone is a link in the chain (no matter where in the chain, how important, what they did or even if they knew who the rest of the chain were) is actually fairly easy to prove. If the Crown wants to make it about sedition then that's up to them - so far they seem rather intent on it.Bomberhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06019007449666643244noreply@blogger.com