that "brand"
I've been waiting, waiting, waiting for the Maori Party to put out their policies, or even give an indication of their general policy principles. No dice. They were due in time for Waitangi Day and it is now nearly May. The latest I read is that they are "fine-tuning" them.
This means they can effectively be all things to all people - they haven't put a stake in the ground over anything except the Foreshore and Seabed legislation.
Tonight I heard two interviews with Maori Party candidates on Mana Report that really worry me. They didn't talk about policy at all but both of them, and the introduction, waxed lyrical about the Maori Party "brand" - how strong it is, how well recognised, etc.
I can think of several other strong brands off the top of my head, and what their advertising portrays - Nike (read: shoes that some people think are cool), McDonalds (read: happy times and yummy food), Farmers (read: good quality but not expensive all-sorts of things).
But what does the Maori Party brand stand for? What ideals and principles are behind it? What is the kaupapa of the Maori Party? If the candidates know would they like to share it with the general populace please??
I guess I just find a political party with no policies a bit dishonest.
9 comments:
Perhaps their brand is simply "anti labour alliance", and having policies Labour can annihilate would simply be a bad tactic.
I don't think they really have to have much substance, they can get along much like UF does.
UF does have policy, always has, but it doesn't get reported much (particularly before the last election when neither their policies nor their candidates got much scrutiny, resulting in many of their voters being a bit pissed off a few months down the track).
Scott - you are right about the indications Turia's voting, media statements etc are giving, but they don't seemed to be based on any policy principles, which is what concerns me (of course the direction of her outbursts also concerns me). The education policy was also only a draft apparently.
I'm not really a big policy wonk (as readers can tell, i'm more into the cut and thrust and the general principles) but I really do think that a lack of published policy is a big hole in the credibility of a party. If nothing else it shows that there is a lack of member input into the policy process - it means any MP MPs can vote on the basis of personal whim and strategy that suits the moment, rather than the actual kaupapa of their party.
My point is that their tactic is to push against what the current government is doing, rather than push their own policies really hard.
Its what minor parties not in Govt do.
The Maori Party has some key policies as well, it just prefers to attack Labour, its more productive for them.
Peter Sharples said on radio/nz that the MP would deny access to the F&S to certain people.
The MS would decide whom those people would be deemed to be.
This is their policy. "Once we have the chance we will make up some rules."
I don't think they really understand the term...representative.
Minor parties who are not in Govt, in fact all parties who are not in Govt, do push against what the Govt are doing, but they usually put up actual alternatives instead of just saying "don't do that."
Surely voters will be wary of a party that merely attacks the Govt to solicit votes, eg NZF in 1996, when they swept the Maori electorates? I guess I am just a bit too hopeful sometimes.
merc - I think you mean MP not MS ;-) realistically they would be in a minority in any Govt and I don't think they could determine the rules around F&S access. could they?
They could do whatever they want if they held the balance of power. We know that Labour are unscrupulous and would fold to any demand if it meant they kept their grasp on power.
Whoops MP not MS!
Scott, I agree. But the MP is going to have to be very clever to outwit this Govt.
As a surfer I'm with Maori on the F&S, but as a Pakeha I am excluded. The Govt in no way represent me on the F&S.
The Govt have granted licenses to mine Muriwai sand to the Chinese. I cannot believe we are so locked in the last century of denuding natural resources. It is so stupid. I million people visit Muriwai each year. Why not value that?
If the MP takes up this issue I will stand with them.
There were certainly Alliance members on the Hikoi (both of them) Scott - I think it is a bit unfair of you to say that, given that you know I was on the second one and that I wasn't the only one!
At the time the party was in a bit of a parlous state internally over the issue of joining the Maori Party and while our leaders marched they didn't take banners to show our presence, which was a pity I agree.
Post a Comment